chantaycDESMA9

Extra Credit 2:

For my second extra credit event I attended the event titled, Staring in the Age of Destruction. Unfortunately I was unable to speak with the artist of the artwork I chose to write about. However, I did speak with the professor and she can vouch for my attendance. I will summarize the description of the artwork I saw and why I chose this piece to write about. I will then write the questions I would have posed to the author of this work.

The name of the artwork I chose was called Fashions and it was created by Bowan Hesslegrave. The information presented about the artwork states," The objectification of the body is old hat. Historically, the objectification of the body has been a gendered issue, seeing women's bodies as objects or things"(Hesslegrave). They exemplify objectification in this artwork through the process of dressing. I found this interesting because I never looked at objectification in this sort of way. To understand that a person who lives up to societies expectations because they feel that is what is "correct", allows them to objectify themselves. It also allows for the world to objectify the person.

They decided to present the information with an ambivalent attitude, as mentioned in the book. The person did this because they believe there is no such thing as a "perfect" feminist. A couple of questions that I had for the artist were, How did you develop the action of dressing to symbolize objectification of the body? Where the clothes that you chose meaningful to you or the concept? What is your personal opinion on society and how they objective others? Do you work on yourself and the natural mindset of judging and objectifying? I really enjoyed reading the research behind the project and just understanding the visual. Life has multiple meanings and to everyone it plays a different role. This art exemplifies meaning each person puts into a single action.

chantaycDESMA9

Extra Credit 1:

For my fourth event I attended Natasha Meyers lecture on May 17, 2016, called Ungrid-able Ecologies. I was unable to get a picture with Natasha Meyers nor Professor Vesna because I had to leave the lecture a little early, but I did speak to Professor Vesna and I took pictures. Natasha Meyers is a philanthropist, active participant in her studies and experimentations and watches closely to plants and fungi. She said, " Plants are a force of power that we should reckon with." To me this ment that as individuals we need to learn more about our environment and what it is offering us.

Natasha Meyers showed a video of the carbon dioxide levels for the year 2006. The carbon dioxide was labeled red and we were able to see the when carbon dioxide was expansive and when it was not. When seasons change and forest photosynthesize in the summer you can see a change in carbon dioxide levels. This was interesting because I did not know that carbon dioxide levels fluctuated. 

I have attached the video we watched above, therefore you can see the changes I saw. Then we moved on to focus on the plants, plants made life possible. Plants create energy, air, sugar that is needed to nourish us. She said, "We are only because they are". We need to respect the land and nurture it like it has nurtured us for all these years. She talked about how the trees remember a time before colonization, trees and plants have survived through it all. Then she went on to explain a few of her experiments, her ecological monitoring. At first I was confused because I did not understand what the purpose of the video and what it meant. The whole time it was playing I was so focused. I was trying to find out it meaning and what the images where about. It looked like a bunch of blurred photos that where shot with movement. I could barely make out what each photo was. Then there was sound to the video and the sound was not matching the photo. It was not until after the video that she explained what she did. The photos where taken while dancing and therefore that is why the photos were blurry and out of focus. The music was sped up and slowed down just to manipulate the sounds. After finding this meaning it added to the art the images brought and the formulation of the video. This was a great lecture and really opened my eyes to the environment and what it has offered me.

Video cite

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1SgmFa0r04

chantaycDESMA9

Event 3:

For my third event I decided to go to the In Focus exhibit at the Getty Museum. This was my very first time at the Getty Museum, and I loved it. It was very beautiful and peaceful. There were tons of different artwork that I was able to look at and multiple exhibits that I went inside and learned about. Unfortunately I was unable to take photos of the exhibit because it was prohibited, however, I can pull up a few photos online that I saw in the exhibit. The first thing I noticed when I walked into the exhibit besides all the photos where the categories. There was electrical experimentation, hardwire, Lightbulb moments, Darkness made light, and a few more.

The first category I went to was the electrical experimentation and that one focused on the 1840's and how electrical tests were conducted by researchers engaged in photographic investigations. The use of flash photography was used to capture instantaneous actions. Artist would use electricity as both  force of empowerment and annihilation. Then I moved towards Hardwire, which talked about how wiring needed to maintain the flow of current. The exhibit talked about environmental concerns and longer working hours for people. This was all interesting because the art that encompassed these ideas where perfectly matched and told a story. 

Then I moved on towards the Lightbulb moments. This section talked about how lightbulbs often emblematic of innovation, Two artists, Vaclav Chochola and Jaroslav Rossler, made images of lamps that played a crucial role in both of their professions. The last section I visited was Darkness made light, which used light pollution in landscape. I found this exhibit interesting because like mentioned in the exhibit, "people often take electricity for granted until we are temporarily without it". I would recommend this exhibit because I was a great self learning experiment as well as a very detailed and well put together exhibit.

Cite of photos

http://www.usnewsexpress.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/gm_35300001_2000x2000.jpg

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-G1jPhxgKR3w/T4D6PxaEyjI/AAAAAAAAX9M/lL8UdaR1tqU/s1600/15980-Vaclav_Chochola_Jiri_-Kolar.jpg

chantaycDESMA9

Week 9: Space+Art

This week we focused on Space and Art and I enjoyed the conversations about the power of ten rule. It sort of looked like a zooming mechanism with a focal point. The space that was using the power of ten would stay within the whole image regardless of how big the frame or picture got.

Scientists use art to better understand the science of outer space and the world around them. As Arthur Woods, an astronomer who is part of the Leonardo Space Art Project, said, “The key to this solution is not in technology alone because most of the necessary technology already exists, but rather in manifesting a deep and global understanding of the human situation vis-a-vis the dimensions of the Universe.” (Leonardo Space Art Project). This is an interesting theory that has been posed and has been shown through tv shows in this era. For example a Netflix show called "The 100" leans towards these ideas and represents them as such. I found this interesting because resources are limited and technology and art combined will help cypher out what is usable for humanity.

I also found Kathleen Forde's, “Dancing on the Ceiling: Art & Zero Gravity”, very interesting. "The artists represented in this exhibition explore—and on occasion create—the condition of weightlessness on earth, using photography, sculpture, installation, film, and video."(Kathleen Forde) I like how gravity was manipulated and used to form artistic pieces of work and draws a line between reality and ordinary. This ties into what professor Vesna spoke about when she said that NanoTechnology plays a role in the topic of space. My perspective would show that most of the previous lessons are combined in this lesson to develop our knowledge of space.

Overall this week has informed me on the history of space and how scientist have been able to make advancements in outer space. Professor Vesna talked about the history of the solar system and Capernacus and the history of the development of the atomic and hydrogen bombs, the arms and space race. While listening and reading I have learned that when dealing with space and art, there is a combination of many other types of art that we learned about, for example Nano Technology. 

Bibliography

“Dancing on the Ceiling: Art & Zero Gravity at EMPAC.” Art & Education. N.p.. Web. 29 May 2016. <http://www.artandeducation.net/announcement/dancing-on-the-ceiling-art-zero-gravity-at-empac/>.

EamesOffice. "Powers of Ten™ (1977)." YouTube. YouTube, 26 Aug. 2010. Web. 29 May 2016.

“Leonardo Space Art Project Visioneers.” Leonardo Space Art Project. MIT Press, 1996. Web. 29 May 2016.

Vesna. "8 Space Intro 1280x720." YouTube. YouTube, 29 July 2013. Web. 29 May 2016.

Vesna. "8 Space Pt1 1280x720." YouTube. YouTube, 29 July 2013. Web. 29 May 2016.

http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/24609260915_a840b027e5_o.jpg

http://cdn.phys.org/newman/gfx/news/hires/hubble.jpg

http://stagevu.com/img/thumbnail/iyqqtkeztweobig.jpg

chantaycDESMA9

Week 8: NanoTech+Art

In this weeks lecture on nanotechnology we look at the art not seen by the naked eye. NanoTechnology is all around us yet most of us do not see it. Nano is greek for dwarf and nanotechnology was coined in 1974 by Norio Taniguchi of the Tokyo University of science. They did not use the term as it is used today, but they used it to describe thin film deposition ans ion beam milling. This week was very interesting because for something to be so small, it can make a huge impact. For example we talked about the different plants that were harvested to develop a thin layer that is hydrophobic. The abilty for a plant to do this is because of nanotechnology and the advance placement of atoms. The nanotechnology and different scopes can help change the properties of various things, such as plants, glass and even concrete. These three examples all come from nanotechnology and the ability for the world to become more efficient.

Boo Chapple has been working on a project that will allow audio speakers from bone. I look at this process as recycling. Imagine we use a cows meat for food, their skin for clothing, and then their bones for speakers. That would be an efficient way to use all aspects of that particular animal as well as other animals. The way they would create this is by figuring out a way to find the vibrations within the bone(s) that can be used for audio sound.

Boo Chapple 2009 Australia[Transjuicer]

Another fascinating thing I have learned this week about nanotechnology is the size. Like I mentioned before nanotechnology is used in our daily life and technology. For example a camera has a chip that allows it to function. The chip within the camera is fairly small yet the camera is big. Of course it would make no sense to have just a chip to take a picture and this is where art comes in for me. The artistic part of nanotechnology is what it gives the user and how/what it formulates. We do not by the chip, we buy the camera and what it offers us, a clear image of what we take a picture of. There is a lot more I have to say about nanotechnology yet I do not have enough space, but I have explained the three examples that have stuck with me about nanotechnology and how it works.

Bibliography

“Art in the Age of Nanotechnology.” Artabase. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 May. 2016. <http://www.artabase.net/exhibition/2104-art-in-the-age-of-nanotechnology>.

Gimzewski. "Nanotech Jim Pt1/2/3/4/6." YouTube. YouTube, 21 May 2012. Web. 17 May 2016.

Gimzewski, Jim, and Victoria Vesna. The Nanomeme Syndrome: Blurring of Fact & Fiction in the Construction of a New Science. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 May. 2016. <http://vv.arts.ucla.edu/publications/publications/02-03/JV_nano/JV_nano_artF5VG.htm>.

"Making Stuff Smaller." PBS. PBS, 16 Jan. 2011. Web. 17 May 2016.

Vesna, Victoria. "Nanotech Intro." YouTube. YouTube, 26 Mar. 2012. Web. 17 May 2016.

http://imgsv.imaging.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d3200/img/compatibility03/parts_and_controls.png

http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/water-repel-ft.jpg

chantaycDESMA9

Event 2: 

For my second event I decided to go to the lecture given by Maša Jazbec. Maša Jazbec talked about humanized robots and androids and her experience with them. I found this lecture very interesting and it was cool. The term robot was coined jan 25, 1921 by Prague in Czech Republic. She talked about how robots are everywhere and how they are expanding. She went on to talk about how ATM Machines are considered robots because they take the place of a human being and the job of a human. The main part of her lecture that I found the most interesting was the humanoids. Humanoids are just humanized robots, they are interesting to me because I had never seen robots that looked so human like. She spoke about the different movies that used humanized robots. Golem is the first movie with robots. Bishop android,Aliens and Alien 3, was a robotic character along with Android Ray from the movie Blade Runner. I connected these movies to a movie I had watched when I was younger, Inspector Gadget. Inspector Gadget was a Disney movie that encompassed the works of humanized robotics.

We then went on to talk about some of the well known robots and what they can do as far as interaction. We talked about Telenoids, which is a teleoperated robot ATR Hiroshi Ishiguro Lab[you can communicate with the robot/it even hugs you] We talked about ASIMO which is a robot that can walk up and downstairs and is well known around the world. Scientists want to have humanized robots walking around on earth that are helpful and live as humans. They have a DARPA Robotics Challenge which is a competition between robots to see which one could handle real world experiences. They have robots open and close doors, walk upstairs and downstairs, they must complete human tasks. For example they should be able to pick up boxes and get up when pushed down. There are scientist who have been able to make this happen, but there are still lots of modifications to be made.

The last thing I found extremely interesting was Professor DR. HIROSHI ISHIGURO. He created a replica of himself in humanoid form. The robot had such real person like qualities, from the finger nails to the eyebrows. This shows that this is an artwork combined with the use of robotics. Maša Jazbec will be working with understanding a robots perspective. She will be focusing on the ability for humans to see through the eyes of a robot. I really enjoyed this lecture and I was informed on so much and go to look at a lot of examples of robots that acted like humans and some even looked like humans.

Cite of photos

http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/avp/images/c/cd/Bishop_Halved.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20091117004831

https://lumiere-a.akamaihd.net/v1/images/open-uri20150422-12561-16waq7h_4f84d0b8.jpeg

http://makeagif.com/ebMPlp

chantaycDESMA9

Week 7: Neuroscience+Art

The brain is one of the most interesting organs in the human body. This week we dove deeper into the mind and activities of the brain and what can alter or impact it. The study of the brain is constantly advancing and the technology used to look inside the brain has grown over the years. Ramon and Franz Gall were critical in showing us how the brain works. The development of the microscope and electricity made it possible to dive deeper into the brain. Scientist would use neon coloring to separate the different aspects of the brains and its neurons. Franz went on to develop the idea that the brain has 27 different functions related to it; the first 19 functions are shared between human and animals and the last 8 are specific to humans. The brain is elaborate and one scientist after the next has been able to pave a path to more experimentation.

The idea that Scientist are artists exists. The way the individual develops ways to look at the brain and intricate design models is a representation of art. For example with Mark Cohen and his many different tools to measure brain activity and monitor neurons; those pieces are art. There was a device that was used to measure migraines and the developments. The devices was sort of like a cap with glasses and the lens flickered LED lights which helped measure the migraines and there activity. This was a trick to stimulate the brain and see what part corresponds with the lights and migraine. One of the most interesting topics from this week to me was the information about the drug LSD. Albert Hoffman in 1978 used LSD and informed that it was a hallucinogenic that put a person in a dream like state. He was unsure what the drug did at first, it was until he interacted with it that he realized the power of the drug. A professor at Harvard University, named Timothy, would do experiments with students with this drug. He went on to produce the saying, "Turn on, Tune in, and Drop out". This was an issue because although the drug was legal it was not presented in the cprrect content and was not to be given to students by a professor. This drug "corrupted" the mind and cause the brain to hallucinate. Scientist continue to advance in knowledge of the brain and what outside drugs and simple daily tasks do to affect the brain.

Bibliography:

Bateson, Gregory. "MIND AND NATURE by Gregory Bateson." MIND AND NATURE by Gregory Bateson. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 May 2016.

Cohan, Mark. Lecture. 13 May, 2016 <http://www.youtube.com/watchfeature=player_embedded&v=eDq8uTROeXU>

"Lysergic Acid Diethylamide." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 13 May 2016.

Vesna, Victoria. “Conscious / Memory (Part 1).” Lecture. 13 May, 2016. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=DLVQIwOn7o8>

Vesna, Victoria. Lecture. “Conscious / Memory (Part 2).” 13 May, 2016. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Xlg5wXHWZNI>

Vesna, Victoria. Lecture. “Conscious / Memory (Part 3).” 13 May, 2016. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=E5EX75xoBJ0>

Wheeler, Mark. "How to Build a Bigger Brain." UCLA Newsroom. N.p., 12 May 2009. Web. 13 May 2016

http://cdn.thedailybeast.com/content/dailybeast/articles/2014/09/08/lsd-is-ready-for-a-comeback/jcr:content/image.img.2000.jpg/1410204667724.cached.jpg

http://www.lovethispic.com/uploaded_images/89202-Lsd-God.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/05/27/article-2639890-04D4C12D0000044D-262_634x516.jpg

http://www.scientificamerican.com/sciam/assets/media/multimedia/110514-MindListicle/2_2.jpg

https://neuwritesd.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/right-left-brain-collage.jpg

chantaycDESMA9

Week 6: Biotech+Art

I was not expecting to learn about genetic modification and the morphing or genes to expand on a study and develop art. Joe Davis who is considered the pioneer of Biotech Art wanted to learn about how to synthesize DNA. I enjoyed learning about the Audio Microscope because it transfers light information into sound. I thought it was different that he used a bacteria and gave it human like qualities. What I mean by this is that he used the Audio microscope to determine how Ecoli would respond to Jazz and other sounds. I have never thought about bacteria responding to music nor any sound of that matter.  I want to touch on Adam Zaretsky and his experiments with the zebra fish eggs. He wanted to morph two genes to create one and I thought this engaged many different aspects of this weeks readings.

Audio Microscope: Joe Davis

The main thing that caught my attention this week was lecture part four when Orlan spoke about body manipulation. Orlan was a french artist who practiced public plastic surgery performance. She is different from other plastic surgeons because she deals with cross breading and her performance is not for the advancement of beauty but for science. The lecture also spoke about Stelarc's third ear. I found this the very interesting because I kept asking myself why. The video stated that its purpose was body jewelry as well as modification of the body. There was a belief that the human body was not enough and this was a way to counteract that. This procedure could also be seen as a 3D implant for trans-humanism. This was pretty cool to me because it reminded me of Spy Kids. As shown below is a human with multiple faces, I always thought this was funny but now I find it interesting because the writer could be referring to Biotech art while producing this movie.

Third Ear

Spy Kids[Art manipulation]

When dealing with art you have to be cautious because art has no true definition. While reading Paul Vanouse's, "Suspect Inversion Center", I realized how different art is. He talks about the fingerprint and how that can lead to misinformation because of duplication and system errors, he proposes using more of a DNA scale because DNA replication is not prominent. He talks about DNA imaging and the stages of how to improve results. This ties back into Orlan because it deals with individualism and the body. 

Bibliography

Posey, Parker. "Swank Motion Pictures, Inc." Swank Motion Pictures, Inc. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 May 2016.

Vanouse, Paul. "Suspect Inversion Center (SIC)." Suspect Inversion Center (SIC). N.p., n.d. Web. 08 May 2016.

Venter, Craig. "Watch Me Unveil "synthetic Life"" Craig Venter:. N.p., May 2010. Web. 08 May 2016.

Vesna, Victoria, narr. “BioTech Art Lectures I-V.” N.p., . web. 5 Nov 2012.

Zaretsky, Adam. "Strains:." VivoArts: Embryonic Sculpting. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 May 2016.

http://geneticsandculture.com/genetics_culture/pages_genetics_culture/gc_w03/davis_j_webarchive/artistic_molecules/artisticmol_2

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/cc/ae/48/ccae48dac89e6f6f81bfb0a4e3d06faa.jpg

http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/villains/images/3/39/Spy_kids_robert_patrick_robert_rodriguez_014_jpg_gkng-1-.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20140605204230

http://www.neelscorner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/zebra-fish-64-thumb.jpg

chantaycDESMA9

Event 1:

For my first event I attended the Toni Dove Art/Sci DMA Lecture on April 19th 2016.

Toni Dove

Toni Dove talked about using interactivity to navigate in a way in which you can connect to media. I found this perspective interesting because it reminded me about one of the first readings we did in the class. In Snow's reading it talked about finding the connection between the art and science. Yes Toni Dove is not specifically stating these two things as finding a connection but her trying to find a way to become more involved with art through technology is great. I also was amazed at how she used the camera from a computer to capture her movements which got mirrored through a virtual world. The histograms would show the video that is capturing her movements with her hands. Before listening to her speak and the videos that were shown I did not know that was possible. I thought there had to be a remote control or it had to be done graphically on a computer. 

She talked about her interest with interface and how interface can contain a recipe for disbelief. She wanted to put those two things together, one being suspension of disbelief and the other being interface of the narrative to create a powerful immersive language. Toni Dove wanted to experiment with a full narrative and she created a featured like movie that was performed by two people on 3  screens and it acted as multiple virtual realities. For example two that I remembered are searching for her father and ending up in the body of another women in New York during stock crash.

This helps me understand the correlation between technology and art because she uses technology to advance her visions. She uses robotics in the sense of imaging her reactions to be perceived by another. As well as by typing a word and it being said by "Sally" I believe. The way art is used by Toni Dove is different from what I have seen. She has a compilation of art robotics and technology. The images I chose to post symbolize to me some of the most advanced works she displayed to us. They are either apart of her full narrative or when she enhanced the play to 3 screens and the visions behind her motivation.

chantaycDESMA9

Week 5: Midterm

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1OJ9VRTOZi-74Z6z89ftzCtmEdan8-X2nsw9Ol4F1vck/edit?usp=sharing

chantaycDESMA9

Week 4: MedTech+Art

When I saw this weeks topic I was confused on how Medicine and Art correlate. I then thought about the time I got my finger scanned to check and see if it was broken and I remembered the images. The technology was able to show a picture of my bone, I found this interesting. It was not until completing this weeks readings and videos that I learned more about the connection between the two.

X-Ray 

The new technologies give scientist the ability to identify all new types of genes and DNA as well as give them a visual (Ingber). We are able to see what is going on inside the human body and develop new cures. The images get microscopic imaging and can even show density. After reading, "The Hippocratic Oath Today" by Peter-Tyson, the section labeled the modern version expresses that they will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science. I agree because when I was explaining earlier about my X-Ray I was thinking about what what Casini had said about MRI. The MRI scans a portrait of the human being; my X-Ray gave an image of my hand. Art correlates with medicine because they present an image with multiple meanings and the outcome depends on the person who is looking at the image.

Brain Image with Color(ART)

We also learned about plastic surgery and the procedures people undertake in order to match beauty or the look they want. I disagree with the use of surgery and medical advancements to enhance a persons appearance just for fun. The silicon and practice is very dangerous in my eyes. I see it as art being used as a negative. The body out of its natural form is reckless and looses the originality it came to the world with. Medicine and art are one in the same and I learned that this week. I learned that medicine creates a different form of art for science.

Body Image

Plastic Surgery

Bibliography

Vesna, Victoria. “Http://www.youtube.com/v/Ep0M2bOM9Tk.” Lecture. Medicine pt1 . Youtube, 21 Apr. 2012. Web. 23 April, 2016. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ep0M2bOM9Tk>

Vesna, Victoria. “Http://www.youtube.com/v/FIX-9mXd3Y4.” Lecture. Medicine pt3. Youtube, 22 Apr. 2012. Web. 23 April, 2016. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIX-9mXd3Y4>.

Casini, Silvia. “Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as Mirror and Portrait: MRI Configurations Between Science and Arts.” (n.d.): n. pag. Web. 23 April, 2016.

Tyson, Peter. “The Hippocratic Oath Today.” PBS. PBS, 27 Mar. 2001. Web. 23 April, 2016.<http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/body/hippocratic-oath-today.html>.

Ingber, Donald. "The Architecture of Life."Jan 1998. Web23 April, 2016.<5-ingber_architecture-of-life.pdf>

http://images.radiopaedia.org/images/590933/a9df56159ce64b104114a5cf46dd5f.jpg

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1866056/thumbs/o-BRAIN-570.jpg?1

http://cdn.skipandgiggle.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/cosmetic-surgery-thailand.jpg

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/API3j0bMMRQ/hqdefault.jpg

chantaycDESMA9

Rollercoaster

Week 3: Robotics+Art
       Initially I figured we would be learning just about robots and how art transformed how society perceives them. However I actually learned that robotics has to deal with computers, graphic design, the internet and much more. The industrializations of the different mechanisms used to create art have expanded over the centuries. To the left is a picture of myself on a rollercoaster, it wasn't until I read this week's readings and lectures that I admired the art. Not only is the rollercoaster a symbolic portion to robotics and the way society uses technology but the photograph itself and the digitalized animations. This image made me think about what Walter Benjamin argued about in his essay “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction”. He said,"Even the most perfect reproduction of a work of art is lacking in one element it's presence in time and place...". This line was very powerful to me because as I looked at this image I realized that every single person had the same exact one, just with their face. Professor Vesna talked about Gutenberg and how the printing press was sort of like a bases for mass production and assembly. There was no individualism and no creativity. The art work was just being displayed. Benjamin talked about how the mass production of art can remove the creativity and originality from the artist from the piece of work. I think this is shown in the photo to the top left. Douglas Davis talked about pure and original. He talked about how the computers allow for the manipulation of art and its form. In the movie Big Hero6 the robot interacts with humans in a way to aid them from danger. Professor Vesna also spoke about how Karel Capek coined the term robot. This was sort of a bases and now that technology has advance the robots shown in dramas and movies have have become more elaborate. The people in Big Hero 6 responded to the robot as a member of society because the robot was helpful. However in other featured movies of robots, for example Irobot, the town responded based on how the robots treated them. Art has many realms and can be analyzed, perceived and created in many different ways. Art has only grown and will continue to do so.

Irobot

Big Hero 6

Iron Man[humanized robots]

References

Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Marxists. N.p.. Web. 17 April 2016. <http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm>


Davis, Douglas. “The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction.” The MIT Press, 1995. Web. 17 April 2016. <http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1576221uid=3739560&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21101286048881>


Uconlineprogram. “Robotics MachikoKusahara 1.” YouTube. YouTube, 14 Apr. 2012. Web. 17 April 2016. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded>.


Vesna, Victoria. “CoLE.” CoLE. N.p.. Web. 17 April 2016. <https://cole.uconline.edu/~UCLA-201209-12F-DESMA-9-1

"Links and Cool Stuff." Links and Cool Stuff. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016.

http://www.deepfocusreview.com/reviews/images/irobot2.jpg

http://bpar.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Big-Hero-6-Movie-54.jpg

http://harvardpolitics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/iron-man1.jpg

chantaycDESMA9

Week 2: Math+Art

Math+Art

This week, Dr. Vesna, talks about how artist use mathematics to create art. I learned that mathematics is driving reality through the use of computers. Some artist state that they hate mathematics but then they use computers and using computers is using mathematics. I also learned that all artists didn’t use perspective and vanishing points, which correspond to math techniques, to create art. Using the math techniques made the artwork more realistic and gave the image a focus point. The vanishing point theorem expresses that the lines are parallel to one another but not to the pictures plane. This is important to an image because it gives the image a real world affect.

Golden Ratio

Dr. Vesna also talked about the Golden Ratio in architecture as well as art. She mentioned the Egyptians and the pyramids as a base for the Golden Ratio and that it was from the Greek. There is the incorporation of symmetry, geometry with artwork that has used the Golden Ratio rule. I found the “The Fourth Dimension and non-Euclidean Geometry in Modern Art” very interesting. It reminded me of when I was in Calculus and the teacher said that we were going to learn the equation for a 3-D line. I was confused because I did not realize that it was math that allowed for 3-D and 4-D movies and art to exist. The author of this talked about how 4-D enhanced art for the better. Artist would add dimension and abstract pieces of work to their artwork now because of the direction it took the art and how eye catching it became. The novel FlatLand: A Romance of Many Dimensions by Edwin Abbott, was a little different, it focused on perspective. I learn that people perceive things extremely differently depending on their perspectives. How a person perceives an image can be different from another person. As well as the illustration itself can be shown from many different angles to create a different image. This weeks readings and videos have elaborated on my original ideas of how math corresponds with art. Math has enhanced the art form and has brought out a different aspect of imagery. Math provided specific boundaries that has enhanced how the art is seen. Without math, symmetry and 3-D or even 4-D would be impossible and some of the most influential paintings like the Mona Lisa would not exist.

4-D

Perspective

References

Vesna, Victoria. “Mathematics-pt1-ZeroPerspectiveGoldenMean.mov.” Cole UC online. Youtube, 9 April 2012. Web. 09 April 2016 <http://www.youtube.com/watchv=mMmq5B1LKDg&feature=player_embedded>

Math Intro. By Victoria Vesna. YouTube. Uconlineprogram, 26 Mar. 2012. Web. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHiL9iskUWM&feature=player_embedded>

Abbott, Edwin. “Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions.” N.p., n.d. Web. 09 April 2016.<https://cole.uconline.edu/content>

Henderson, Lynda. “The Fourth Dimension and Non-Euclidean Geometry in Modern Art.” N.p., n.d. Web. 09 April 2016. <https://cole.uconline.edu/content>.

Frantz, Marc. Lesson 3: Vanishing Points and Looking at Art (n.d.): n. pag. 2000. Web. 09 Apr. 2016.

http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/perspective2.jpg

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/76/16-cell-orig.gif

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/7f/0f/0d/7f0f0df9513e09d48eea1b9807d74983.jpg

http://discovermagazine.com/~/media/Images/Issues/2014/April/Math%20art%20gallery/math-cover.jpg?mw=738

chantaycDESMA9

    WEEK 1: TWO CULTURES  

       Snows' concept of two cultures did not become prevalent in my life until I attended UCLA. UCLA divides the campus based off the Left and Right side of the brain. Therefore, the more science and math based courses are located on one half of the school and the more arts and humanity based courses are located on the other half. I am a Financial Actuarial Mathematics Major with a minor in Gender Studies. I have the ability to have a dose of both cultures. In Snow's reading I can relate to the tedious and time consuming of dealing with my Math and Sciences courses that I have taken. I understand Snow's prediction that there is a middle gap between the two cultures and that bringing them together is fragile, but I also agree with Vesna's idea that there is a third culture that combines the two cultures.

http://asucla.ucla.edu/restaurants/
This image represents the two cultures on campus

There is a divide between the two cultures and an issue that I read about in, "A Dangerous Divide", explained that the lack of understanding was from both sides is an issue. 

Iphone 6s

For example, in today's society an IPhone is pretty popular. Both cultures are considered when manufacturing and advertising the phone. The scientific and technological advances made for an IPhone have to relate to the sociology and humanities of what society expects the phone to have. An IPhone as well as Androids have a voice command/system embedded in the phone that enables voice communication. The combination of human language and technology to produce the voice shows the connection of the third culture mentioned by Snow. As well as the finger print unlock option for IPhone. The ability for the phone to capture a single human print to allow access to the phone is a socially technological advancement, representing how both cultures fuel one another to advance society.

The three cultures

Before reading these articles and watching the video from David Bohm, I would of never looked at society in this light. I do not separate the world and things around me as science or humanities. After the reading I now realize the difference between them but I also see how well they come together and that without one, the other would be meaningless. 

References

Snow, C. P. The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Cambridge UP, 1959. Print.

Vesna, Victoria. "Toward a Third Culture: Being In Between." Leonardo. 34 (2001): 121-125. 

Print.Bohm, David. "The Implicate Order." YouTube. N.p., 7 July 2008. Web. 03 Apr. 2016

Williams, Christopher. "Academy EBriefings." A Dangerous Divide. The New York Academy of Sciences, 29 July 2009. Web. 01 Apr. 2016.

Bohm, D. "On Creativity." JSTOR. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Oct. 2013.

http://www.tagcloudproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/artscience.jpeg

https://ss7.vzw.com/is/image/VerizonWireless/landing-page-why-vz-iphone-6s-plus-homescreen-v1?$defaultScaleJPG90$

http://asucla.ucla.edu/restaurants/